|
|
 
RECENT ECONOMIC REPORTS
JUNE 3, 1999: WHERE
THERE'S SMOKE, THERE'S KRETEK: THE CIGARETTE INDUSTRY IN
INDONESIA
SUMMARY
1. Cigarette makers in Indonesia have weathered the
economic turmoil of the past 20 months in reasonable
condition. Cigarette sales are highly inelastic and have
remained strong. As a result, local cigarette
manufacturers are among the best performers in the recent
stock market surge. Yet the industry is in a state of
transition. The tax and pricing regime has recently been
altered. Indonesia is a very price-sensitive market, and
the companies are trying to reposition themselves in the
wake of the economic crisis. Large kretek producers
appear to be the biggest beneficiaries of the new system.
The Players
2. Large clove cigarette (kretek) manufacturers
dominate the Indonesian cigarette industry. Kretek
cigarettes, which utilize a blend of cloves and tobacco,
are unique to Indonesia. They have been smoked here for
generations, but have never found a major export market.
Kretek sales represent over 85 percent of the Indonesian
cigarette market and the three biggest firms, Gudam
Garam, Djarum, and Sampoerna, control approximately 65
percent of that. Although total kretek production fell by
three percent in 1998, resulting in some shortages,
overall kretek sales have remained relatively steady
throughout the period of the economic crisis. The two
kretek stocks listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange,
Gudang Garam and Sampoerna, have seen their share prices
increase by 46 percent and 280 percent respectively in
the past ten months. The industry, which is centered in
East Java, plays a key role in the Indonesian economy. It
provides tens of thousands of jobs around the archipelago
(Gudang Garam alone employs 40,000 people) and is the
major customer of Indonesia's clove and tobacco farmers.
3. On the white (standard) cigarette side, British
American Tobacco (BAT) has a 50-percent market share,
while Rothmans and STTC (a domestic company from Sumatra)
each hold 10-11 percent. BAT and Rothmans are in the
final stages of a worldwide merger. The combined company
will produce 22 billion sticks per year in Indonesia,
making it the second largest cigarette company in the
country, behind only Gudam Garam. Philip Morris, which up
until now has produced and marketed only its premium
"Marlboro" brand in Indonesia, is the
fourth-largest producer, but has less than a one-percent
market share. White cigarette sales are dominated by
lower-priced brands, such as Rothman's "Kansas"
and BAT's "Ardath".
4. The dominance of kreteks makes the Indonesian
cigarette market different from any other. In many
markets, including most Asian countries, key issues for
foreign producers are market liberalization and
overcoming government-controlled monopolies. Indonesia is
different. It does not have a cigarette monopoly, but
rather a large number of independent producers, including
foreign companies that have been present since the
colonial era. For the white cigarette manufacturers the
challenge is in gaining market share, not against a
dominant local producer, but against a completely
different product. Moreover, both white and kretek
producers describe brand loyalty as low, saying that
customers switch smokes regularly and are motivated most
strongly by price.
5. White cigarettes are primarily an up-market, urban
product in Indonesia. The economic downturn has
exacerbated the price-sensitivity of relatively affluent
consumers and driven them toward less expensive kreteks.
As an example, in an attempt to make up for lost dollar
revenue due to the weakened rupiah, in late 1997 Philip
Morris increased the price of Marlboros from Rp 2000 to
Rp 6000 a pack. The result was an 80 percent drop in
sales volume. To compensate, Philip Morris has introduced
"Longbeach", a mid-price
"value-for-money" brand, to Indonesia to regain
market share. BAT has taken the opposite tack by recently
bringing in Pall Mall and marketing it as an upscale
brand.
The Tax and Pricing Scheme
6. The old excise tax system differentiated between
whites and kreteks. Kreteks were taxed according to
production volume and have been subject to
ever-increasing minimum prices, based on company size,
since 1991. Kreteks were sub-divided into machine-rolled
and hand-rolled with the machine-rolled version taxed
more heavily and assigned minimum prices that were 70 to
125 percent higher than the hand-rolled variety. By
contrast, taxes on white cigarettes were based on retail
prices and, with lower government-mandated minimum prices
than kreteks, their retail taxes remained down.
7. Given this tax and pricing structure, the largest
kretek manufacturers were assured of having higher
minimum prices and paying the highest taxes in accordance
with their high production volumes, which meant their
cigarettes often cost more at the point of sale. The
result to the consumer was that a pack of 20 premium
white cigarettes cost less than a pack of 16 high-end
kreteks. Through the first half of the 1990s, the white
cigarette manufacturers saw their market share grow
partially due to price advantages resulting from this
system, although that growth has slowed recently.
8. To protect small hand-rolled manufacturers, the
Finance Ministry applied lower taxes and mandated lower
minimum prices for their products. The tax rate and the
minimum prices, combined with minimal overhead, made
hand-rolled kreteks extremely profitable, with margins up
to 40 percent higher than the machine-rolled variety. The
large kretek companies, the majority of whose production
is machine-rolled cigarettes subject to higher minimum
prices and volume-based tariffs, bought up small firms to
sub-contract the manufacture of kreteks to take advantage
of the lower tax and pricing rates. The Finance Ministry
closed that loophole with Ministerial Decree
(SK)104/1997, which prohibited "special
relationships", including ownership, between
cigarette manufacturers and gave the companies until
March 1999 to end any existing relationships. Despite the
deadline, few, if any, divestitures took place.
9. The whole system changed with the implementation of
Ministry of Finance Decrees (SK)124/1999 and
(SK)125/1999. Under (SK)124, the tax and price regimes
for kretek would be applied to whites as of April 1,
1999. At the same time, (SK)125/1999 revoked (SK)104,
thus again permitting the ownership of small kretek
producers by large ones. The white manufacturers
protested against the changes, arguing that it was unfair
to impose the new tariffs in one swoop and that they at
least needed to be phased in. The government gave some
ground and agreed to a three-year phase-in of the new
regime. The kretek manufacturers are not impressed by the
white cigarette companies complaints, pointing out
how kretek tax rates and minimum prices had gone up in
recent years. As one kretek producer said, "we had
to raise our prices five-fold in two years and we
survived. This should be easy for them."
10. The government has also adjusted the tax rates on
kreteks. Under the old system, a small manufacturer could
set a premium price for a kretek, but because the company
had a low production volume, it could pay a lower rate
than a larger producer. That option is gone under the new
system. Now a small producer's products get taxed based
production or retail price, whichever puts them in a
higher bracket. There has also been talk about ending all
minimum pricing requirements, for both white and kretek
cigarettes.
11. Another possible change is linking taxes on
kreteks to tar levels, a policy advocated by the Ministry
of Health. One non-filter, hand-rolled kretek delivers
over 50 milligrams of tar to the smoker, according to the
Ministry of Health. By contrast, a full-flavor white
cigarette such as Marlboro or Lucky Strike (both
available in Indonesia) delivers approximately 18
milligrams of tar. Even with such health concerns,
however, any changes in the excise tax regime will likely
have to have a neutral effect on revenues. Kretek Company
executives have said this is not the first time such
suggestions have been raised and, since there is no
time-frame for such a transition, they are taking a
wait-and-see attitude. Industry sources agree that any
move to tar-based taxation would be a gradual process,
taking years.
The Upshot
12. White cigarette manufacturers claim the new tax
and price policy will raise their prices to the point
that Indonesian consumers will desert their products.
They point out that kretek manufacturers have several
advantages against which they cannot compete. Aside from
the lower tax rates on hand-rolled cigarettes, white
cigarettes can only be sold in packs of 20 sticks while
kreteks can be sold in packs of any number. Kreteks,
which use cloves and more tobacco than whites, can be as
or more expensive per stick than whites. Because they can
be sold in packs of 12 or 16, however, kreteks can be
sold for less per pack, which gives them a key advantage.
13. The white manufacturers have managed to wring talk
of concessions from the government since the new law took
effect. Sources at the Ministry of Finance confirm press
reports that the new tax parity is under review and may
be altered if the burden on white cigarettes proves to be
too high. The government's agreement with the IMF allows
for review of cigarette tariffs in order to meet fiscal
targets. Industry sources have estimated that white
cigarette sales could shrink by two-thirds under the new
system, to only 5 percent of the Indonesian cigarette
market. This would likely result in an excise shortfall
as smokers move to cheaper brands that generate less
excise revenue, which may force the government to
reexamine the new tax structure.
14. The new tax system will affect the kretek
manufacturers in two ways. Any decline in white
consumption will result in consumers switching to
cheaper, especially hand-rolled, kreteks. The new volume
and price system on the kreteks themselves will primarily
hurt a few small manufacturers of high-priced,
hand-rolled kretek who lived on the high-end, low-tax
strategy. They will now have to choose between cutting
prices to move into a lower tax bracket or keeping prices
steady and watching the higher taxes eat into their
margins. In either case, their profitability will suffer.
15. The large kretek firms, who dominate the high-end
market, will be the primary beneficiaries of the new tax
system. With both boutique kretek and white manufacturers
facing higher tariffs in a highly price-sensitive market,
and the end of restrictions on their ownership of small
firms, the big kretek producers are clearly the ones with
the most to celebrate.
Trends | Reports | Energy | Petroleum | Investment
|
|